RTFA: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070523-rese…

“Last time, it took nine years for us to generalize from a special to
a nonspecial, hard-to-factor number,” Lenstra said in a statement, referring
to a 155-digit number that his team had broken previously. More recently,
a 200-digit non-special number was factored in 18 months and roughly 50 years
of computer time. This 307-digit crack took even less (human) time, which
Lenstra credits to more powerful computers and improved code. “I will
not make predictions [about the future of 1024-bit encryption], but let us
just say that it might be a good idea to stay tuned.”

Why does anyone care? While your average Joe or Jane on the street will not
be able to crack a 1024-bit RSA key anytime soon, experienced attackers might
not have such a hard time. Getting the computing power to crack a 1024-bit
key could be as easy as employing a decent-sized botnet
or two.

Someone clicked to RTFA after searching for “rsa bot net crack.” I saw that and realized it’s an insanely cool concept. Lo, the idea has been floated before.

  • fumf
    very cool... although if i had a bot net, i'd make the most realistic 3d simulation of paris hilton's sex tape... speaking of which, have you ever read pattern recognition by william gibson?
blog comments powered by Disqus