<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Great Tantra Challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rtfa.net/2008/03/25/the-great-tantra-challenge/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2008/03/25/the-great-tantra-challenge</link>
	<description>read the fucking article</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: farkinga</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2008/03/25/the-great-tantra-challenge/comment-page-1#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>farkinga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 04:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtfa.net/2008/03/25/the-great-tantra-challenge/#comment-517</guid>
		<description>Interesting analysis.  I don&#039;t agree that &quot;it appears [the challenge] was a hoax&quot; and I don&#039;t agree with your blog&#039;s conclusion, which is critical of the skeptics who echoed this story.  Still, you raise a bunch of great points.

This video happens to demonstrate a scene that has played out countless times before, but I am willing to consider that this might be a hoax within a hoax.  Still, it really fits with the historical data that no person could &quot;will&quot; another person to die.

It&#039;s also the case that people have been the victims of hoaxes throughout the ages.  I don&#039;t know if you read this blog much, but the Steorn forums had a great thread about the &quot;Whip-Mag&quot; which was probably a hoax.  We covered it on RTFA.  Granted, the Steorn forum is filled with &quot;fringe scientists&quot; but plenty of them wanted the video to be true...    And a scientist is a human, and a human can be the victim of a hoax.  

I think you&#039;re missing one of the Big Ideas here: as evidence comes along, it needs to be incorporated.    If you ignore some data, then you&#039;re straying from the truth.

...so your claim is that this is a hoax because the Tantrik Priest didn&#039;t believe he could kill the TV guy, and neither did the TV guy - instead, you claim they were both in on the joke.  Fine - that&#039;s interesting, and it&#039;s totally possible.  I&#039;ll take your data into consideration.

Don&#039;t get carried away, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis.  I don&#8217;t agree that &#8220;it appears [the challenge] was a hoax&#8221; and I don&#8217;t agree with your blog&#8217;s conclusion, which is critical of the skeptics who echoed this story.  Still, you raise a bunch of great points.</p>
<p>This video happens to demonstrate a scene that has played out countless times before, but I am willing to consider that this might be a hoax within a hoax.  Still, it really fits with the historical data that no person could &#8220;will&#8221; another person to die.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also the case that people have been the victims of hoaxes throughout the ages.  I don&#8217;t know if you read this blog much, but the Steorn forums had a great thread about the &#8220;Whip-Mag&#8221; which was probably a hoax.  We covered it on RTFA.  Granted, the Steorn forum is filled with &#8220;fringe scientists&#8221; but plenty of them wanted the video to be true&#8230;    And a scientist is a human, and a human can be the victim of a hoax.  </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re missing one of the Big Ideas here: as evidence comes along, it needs to be incorporated.    If you ignore some data, then you&#8217;re straying from the truth.</p>
<p>&#8230;so your claim is that this is a hoax because the Tantrik Priest didn&#8217;t believe he could kill the TV guy, and neither did the TV guy &#8211; instead, you claim they were both in on the joke.  Fine &#8211; that&#8217;s interesting, and it&#8217;s totally possible.  I&#8217;ll take your data into consideration.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get carried away, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM108</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2008/03/25/the-great-tantra-challenge/comment-page-1#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>JM108</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 03:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtfa.net/2008/03/25/the-great-tantra-challenge/#comment-516</guid>
		<description>It appears the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sathyasaibaba.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/great-tantra-challenge-hoax-rationalist-international-india-tv-sanal-edamaruku/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;Great Tantra Challenge&#039;&lt;/a&gt; was a hoax and publicity stunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears the <a href="http://sathyasaibaba.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/great-tantra-challenge-hoax-rationalist-international-india-tv-sanal-edamaruku/" rel="nofollow">&#8216;Great Tantra Challenge&#8217;</a> was a hoax and publicity stunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
