<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roberts double-flubs: Obama can retake Oath of Office, just like Coolidge and Arthur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur</link>
	<description>read the fucking article</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: StevenTaylor</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur/comment-page-1#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator>StevenTaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfa.net/?p=1401#comment-2012</guid>
		<description>Politics is a very dangerous game as we can see and this proves once again that the people we elect don&#039;t actually care about the well being of their voters. Maybe one year nobody will go to vote:)) &lt;br&gt;_________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot; href=&quot;http://artbloggin.com/discount-office-supplies.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Avery Labels&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics is a very dangerous game as we can see and this proves once again that the people we elect don&#39;t actually care about the well being of their voters. Maybe one year nobody will go to vote:)) <br />_________________________________<br /><a rel="follow" href="http://artbloggin.com/discount-office-supplies.html" rel="nofollow">Avery Labels</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidarth Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur/comment-page-1#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidarth Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfa.net/?p=1401#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a full constitutional analysis of this issue and the validity of the second oath of office at Flashscoop...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;here&#039;s the link of any of you guys are interested&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words-unlimited-controversy_06.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s a full constitutional analysis of this issue and the validity of the second oath of office at Flashscoop&#8230;</p>
<p>here&#39;s the link of any of you guys are interested</p>
<p><a href="http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words-unlimited-controversy_06.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words.." rel="nofollow">http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidarth Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur/comment-page-1#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidarth Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfa.net/?p=1401#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a full constitutional analysis of this issue and the validity of the second oath of office at Flashscoop...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;here&#039;s the link of any of you guys are interested&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words-unlimited-controversy_06.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s a full constitutional analysis of this issue and the validity of the second oath of office at Flashscoop&#8230;</p>
<p>here&#39;s the link of any of you guys are interested</p>
<p><a href="http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words-unlimited-controversy_06.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words.." rel="nofollow">http://flashscoop.blogspot.com/2009/02/35-words..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avon, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur/comment-page-1#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Avon, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfa.net/?p=1401#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>I think the Coolidge and Arthur precedents were different - and, arguably, more necessary than Obama&#039;s re-swearing.  Coolidge was sworn in by a notary public, who was not only a blood relative (which disqualifies notaries from serving in many or most states) but also a State, not Federal, office holder.  Likewise, although Arthur was sworn in the first time by a chief judge, it was the New York State chief judge and not a Federal official of any kind.  To be sworn into Federal service, I&#039;d think you&#039;d need a Federal official to preside.  &lt;br&gt;LBJ was - quite famously - sworn in fairly privately too ... aboard a jet at cruising altitude, no less ... but nobody doubted the legality of that.  I don&#039;t think the public setting matters one bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Coolidge and Arthur precedents were different &#8211; and, arguably, more necessary than Obama&#39;s re-swearing.  Coolidge was sworn in by a notary public, who was not only a blood relative (which disqualifies notaries from serving in many or most states) but also a State, not Federal, office holder.  Likewise, although Arthur was sworn in the first time by a chief judge, it was the New York State chief judge and not a Federal official of any kind.  To be sworn into Federal service, I&#39;d think you&#39;d need a Federal official to preside.  <br />LBJ was &#8211; quite famously &#8211; sworn in fairly privately too &#8230; aboard a jet at cruising altitude, no less &#8230; but nobody doubted the legality of that.  I don&#39;t think the public setting matters one bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farkinga</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur/comment-page-1#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>farkinga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfa.net/?p=1401#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>...that was my initial take on the situation, but on that basis, why bother to take the oath a second time?  Initially, it seemed to me that the 20th amendment was adequate for handling the presidential hand-off from Bush to Obama, but as time went on, it seemed like more and more people were uncomfortable with Roberts&#039; wording.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s clearly a moot point, since the oath has been sworn, but for the sake of discussion, let&#039;s assume it was not simply that Roberts goofed.  On that basis, what could have precipitated from the mix-up?  ...anything?  ...if only to set the precedent that the oath had less meaning for future presidents?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;that was my initial take on the situation, but on that basis, why bother to take the oath a second time?  Initially, it seemed to me that the 20th amendment was adequate for handling the presidential hand-off from Bush to Obama, but as time went on, it seemed like more and more people were uncomfortable with Roberts&#39; wording.</p>
<p>It&#39;s clearly a moot point, since the oath has been sworn, but for the sake of discussion, let&#39;s assume it was not simply that Roberts goofed.  On that basis, what could have precipitated from the mix-up?  &#8230;anything?  &#8230;if only to set the precedent that the oath had less meaning for future presidents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur/comment-page-1#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfa.net/?p=1401#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is it even conceivable that Roberts was attempting to have Obama swear a similar, but inaccurate, oath as a precedent for some later action?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No. There&#039;s no way a court would declare Obama &quot;not really president&quot; on the basis of a trivial verbal flub like this. Any court that did something so outrageous would incur enough wrath that impeaching the judges would be a real possibility. Roberts simply goofed. Obama noticed but politely declined to interrupt the ceremony over it, and they fixed it afterward. Nothing to see here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is it even conceivable that Roberts was attempting to have Obama swear a similar, but inaccurate, oath as a precedent for some later action?&#8221;</p>
<p>No. There&#39;s no way a court would declare Obama &#8220;not really president&#8221; on the basis of a trivial verbal flub like this. Any court that did something so outrageous would incur enough wrath that impeaching the judges would be a real possibility. Roberts simply goofed. Obama noticed but politely declined to interrupt the ceremony over it, and they fixed it afterward. Nothing to see here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur/comment-page-1#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfa.net/?p=1401#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>Guess we&#039;ll never know, as he re-took the oath today.   Maybe he&#039;ll get to &quot;do over&quot; his 4-year term beginning in 2013!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess we&#39;ll never know, as he re-took the oath today.   Maybe he&#39;ll get to &#8220;do over&#8221; his 4-year term beginning in 2013!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtfa.net &#187; Obama retakes oath of office a day after Roberts flub</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfa.net/2009/01/21/roberts-double-flubs-obama-can-retake-oath-of-office-just-like-coolidge-and-arthur/comment-page-1#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>rtfa.net &#187; Obama retakes oath of office a day after Roberts flub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfa.net/?p=1401#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>[...] Roberts double-flubs: Obama can retake Oath of Office, just like Coolidge and Arthur [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Roberts double-flubs: Obama can retake Oath of Office, just like Coolidge and Arthur [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
